Drumoyne Gardens | Whitley Bay | NE25 9DL
0191 6432026

Pupil Premium is funding allocated to schools by the government. The children who are eligible for this grant are those who are in receipt of free school meals (FSM) or who have been eligible in the last six years of their education (from September 2012). It also includes any children who have parents in the Armed forces or students who are identified as being in foster care (looked after children). Each school has the freedom to decide how the Pupil Premium, allocated to schools per pupil, is spent, as they are best placed to assess what additional provision should be made for the individual pupils at their school.

Pupil premium statement 2016-17

 

  • Summary information

School

Langley First School

Academic Year

16-17

Total PP budget

£35,740

Date of most recent PP Review

/

Total number of pupils

298

Number of pupils eligible for PP

24

Date for next internal review of this strategy

January 2017

 

  • Current attainment
  •  

Pupils eligible for PP (your school)

Pupils not eligible for PP (national average)

% achieving Level 4b or above in reading, writing & maths (or equivalent)

n/a

tbc

% making at least 2 levels of progress in reading (or equivalent)

n/a

92%

% making at least 2 levels of progress in writing (or equivalent)

n/a

95%

% making at least 2 levels of progress in maths (or equivalent)

n/a

91%

  • Attainment Target Tracker / ARE
  •  
  •  
  • Year 4 10 (17% of yr)

Points Progress
Reading – 12.2
Writing – 12.4
Maths – 12.1

Points Progress
Reading – 12.1
Writing – 12
Maths – 12

  •     % at or above nat ARE     – rding – 100% / Wring – 100% / M – 100%
  •     
  •  
  •  
  •  Year 2
  • 7 (12% of yr)
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Barriers to future attainment (for pupils eligible for PP)

In-school barriers (issues to be addressed in school, such as poor oral language skills)

  •  

Staff perceptions of disadvantaged pupils and the best way to meet their needs

  •  

Effectiveness of strategies / support

C.

 

External barriers (issues which also require action outside school, such as low attendance rates)

D.

Parents acceptance of support / guidance on child’s learning.

  • Desired outcomes (Desired outcomes and how they will be measured)

 

  •  

progress for PP children in writing and maths is in line with reading

PPM make rapid progress

  •  

All staff have clear understanding of effective support for PP children

High quality intervention delivered

  •  

Continue to train support staff so that they are able to deliver high quality intervention to groups.

High quality intervention delivered

  •  

Further develop staff who deliver the most successful interventions.

High quality intervention delivered

 

  • Planned expenditure
  • Academic year
  • 2016-17

The three headings below enable schools to demonstrate how they are using the Pupil Premium to improve classroom pedagogy, provide targeted support and support whole school strategies

  • Quality of teaching for all

Desired outcome

Chosen action / approach

What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?

How will you ensure it is implemented well?

Staff lead

When will you review implementation?

Pupils make at least expected progress in writing and maths

Teaching assistant to have allocated support session for each PP child / group of children

Time to be spent working though children understanding learning to learn – Support feedback and quality marking opportunities

Progress meetings
Intervention and support minutes
Learning walks

SMT

Termly

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total budgeted cost

£10,600

  • Targeted support

Desired outcome

Chosen action / approach

What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?

How will you ensure it is implemented well?

Staff lead

When will you review implementation?

Vulnerable pupils supported emotionally as well as academically

Fund learning mentor to support focus children and families and be proactive in nurturing all vulnerable children.

We have a raising number of children who have emotional barriers to learning such as anxiety

Constant feedback from LM to intervention and support group.  Logs from LM reviewed by HT
Progress meetings

leaning Mentor

Headteacher

Create a nurture space

Learning Mentor to create a safe haven

Safe haven for vulnerable children to go to when needed.  Feel safe and secure reduced possible barriers to learning

Vulnerable children positive feedback to their time in school through PEPS etc

Learning Mentor

 

Total budgeted cost

£20000

  • Other approaches

Desired outcome

Chosen action / approach

What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?

How will you ensure it is implemented well?

Staff lead

When will you review implementation?

All Vulnerable children have access to whole school offer

Funding for vulnerable children to access music tuition and extra curriculum clubs

To support vulnerable children in access full entitlement and be part of the school / support concentration and ability to possibly excel in something other than academic studies

Continue to monitor take up of offer

A Ternent

Summer 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total budgeted cost

£5000

 

  • Review of expenditure

Previous Academic Year

  •  
  • Quality of teaching for all

Desired outcome

Chosen action / approach

Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.

Lessons learned
(and whether you will continue with this approach)

Cost

Improve teacher understanding of vulnerable children

CPD

Partly - need to continue to ensure embedded in practice

Need more individualise package for specific staff.  All very receptive

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Targeted support

Desired outcome

Chosen action / approach

Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.

Lessons learned
(and whether you will continue with this approach)

Cost

Support vulnerable children emotionally

Appointment of Learning Mentor

Yes – LM able to support specific children and negated need for fixed term exclusion

 

£20000

 

 

 

 

 

  • Other approaches

Desired outcome

Chosen action / approach

Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.

Lessons learned
(and whether you will continue with this approach)

Cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pupil Premium Statement 2014-2015
Pupil Premium Statement 2013-2014
Page Reader Press Enter to Read Page Content Out Loud Press Enter to Pause or Restart Reading Page Content Out Loud Press Enter to Stop Reading Page Content Out Loud Screen Reader Support