Pupil Premium

Pupil Premium is funding allocated to schools by the government. The children who are eligible for this grant are those who are in receipt of free school meals (FSM) or who have been eligible in the last six years of their education (from September 2012). It also includes any children who have parents in the Armed forces or students who are identified as being in foster care (looked after children). Each school has the freedom to decide how the Pupil Premium, allocated to schools per pupil, is spent, as they are best placed to assess what additional provision should be made for the individual pupils at their school.

Pupil premium statement 2018-19 Pupil premium statement 2017-18 Pupil premium statement 2016-17 Pupil Premium Statement 2014-2015

Pupil premium statement 2018-19

Summary information
School	Langley First School
Academic Year	18-19	Total PP budget	£43,480	Date of most recent PP Review	/
Total number of pupils	298	Number of pupils eligible for PP	30	Date for next internal review of this strategy	July 2019

Current attainment

	Pupils eligible for PP %	Pupils not eligible for PP (national average)
% achieving age expected or above in Early Years	60	88 (57)
% achieving the expected standard in reading, writing & maths - KS1 K(oequivalent)	67	86 (69)
% making at least expected progress in reading – KS1	67	88 (79)
% making at least expected progress in writing - KS1	67	89 (74)
% making at least expected progress in maths – KS1	67	89 (79)

% making at least expected progress in reading – year 4	80	91.9
% making at least expected progress in writing – year 4	80	85.7
% making at least expected progress in maths – year 4	80	91.9

Barriers to future attainment (for pupils eligible for PP)
In-school barriers (issues to be addressed in school, such as poor oral language skills)
		Staff perceptions of disadvantaged pupils and the best way to meet their needs
		Effectiveness of strategies / support
C.
External barriers (issues which also require action outside school, such as low attendance rates)
D.		Parent’s acceptance of support / guidance on child’s learning.
Desired outcomes (Desired outcomes and how they will be measured)
	progress for PP children in writing and maths is in line with reading		PP make rapid progress
	All staff have clear understanding of effective support for PP children		High quality intervention delivered
	Continue to train support staff so that they are able to deliver high quality intervention to groups.		High quality intervention delivered
	Further develop staff who deliver the most successful interventions.		High quality intervention delivered

Planned expenditure
Academic year		2018/19
The three headings below enable schools to demonstrate how they are using the Pupil Premium to improve classroom pedagogy, provide targeted support and support whole school strategies
Quality of teaching for all
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach		What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?	How will you ensure it is implemented well?	Staff lead	When will you review implementation?
Pupils make at least expected progress in writing and maths	Teaching assistant to have allocated support session for each PP child / group of children		Time to be spent working though children understanding learning to learn – Support feedback and quality marking opportunities	Progress meetings Intervention and support minutes Learning walks	SMT	Termly

Total budgeted cost						£10,600
Targeted support
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach		What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?	How will you ensure it is implemented well?	Staff lead	When will you review implementation?
Vulnerable pupils supported emotionally as well as academically	Fund learning mentor and develop the Nurture provision to focus children and families and be proactive in nurturing all vulnerable children.		We have a rising number of children who have emotional barriers to learning such as anxiety	Constant feedback from LM to intervention and support group. Logs from LM reviewed by HT Progress meetings Use of Boxall Profile assessment to establish pupil progress	leaning Mentor	Ongoing Headteacher
Create a nurture space	Learning Mentor to create a safe haven		Safe haven for vulnerable children to go to when needed. Feel safe and secure reduced possible barriers to learning	Vulnerable children positive feedback to their time in school through PEPS etc	Learning Mentor
Total budgeted cost						£20000
Other approaches
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach		What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?	How will you ensure it is implemented well?	Staff lead	When will you review implementation?
All Vulnerable children have access to whole school offer	Funding for vulnerable children to access music tuition and extra curriculum clubs		To support vulnerable children in access full entitlement and be part of the school / support concentration and ability to possibly excel in something other than academic studies	Continue to monitor take up of offer	A Ternent	Summer 2018

Total budgeted cost						£5000

Review of expenditure
Previous Academic Year
Quality of teaching for all
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach	Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.	Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach)	Cost
Improve teacher understanding of vulnerable children	CPD	Staff have a good understanding and knowledge of PP and the children that this impacts on within their care. Due to staff changes and movement this is something that would be beneficial to school to continue into future year.	Need more individualise package for specific staff. All very receptive to opportunity for training.

Targeted support
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach	Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.	Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach)	Cost
Support vulnerable children emotionally	Work of Learning Mentor across the school	The nurture provision is a highly successful strategy which supports disadvantaged pupils beyond the classroom and helps enable them to access the curriculum	Learning Mentor role has to be flexible to meet the demands of the cohort of children within school and the complexity of the children and parents needs.	£20000

Other approaches
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach	Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.	Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach)	Cost
To offer PP children broader experiences then they would normally be able to have	Fund access to music tuition and orchestra club	A large percentage of PP children took up the offer of free lessons which has given an opportunity to experience / develop skills otherwise not have the chance. Most have continued with lessons into a second year.	This opportunity has been excellent for those accessing as they would normally not receive this tuition. The opportunity for them to share with their parents in the concerts is immeasurable. Thought needs to be given to possibly funding keyboard loans for those children who want to play the keyboard but cannot afford one at home to practise	£2000
All PP children given opportunity to develop their resilience and determination	Fund PP children to attend outward bound pursuit residential trip	Feedback from children (PP and rest) very positive. Group leaders full of praise for the children, their attitude and behaviour. Excellent way to develop children’s problem solving and resilience.	Funding this activity needs to continue to ensure that all children have access to this opportunity	£1255

Additional detail

In this section you can annex or refer to additional information which you have used to support the sections above.

Pupil premium statement 2017-18

Summary information
School	Langley First School
Academic Year	17-18	Total PP budget	£43,480	Date of most recent PP Review	/
Total number of pupils	298	Number of pupils eligible for PP	30	Date for next internal review of this strategy	January 2019

Current attainment

	Pupils eligible for PP %	Pupils not eligible for PP (national average)
% achieving age expected or above in Early Years	60	88 (57)
% achieving the expected standard in reading, writing & maths - KS1 K(oequivalent)	67	86 (69)
% making at least expected progress in reading – KS1	67	88 (79)
% making at least expected progress in writing - KS1	67	89 (74)
% making at least expected progress in maths – KS1	67	89 (79)

% making at least expected progress in reading – year 4	80	91.9
% making at least expected progress in writing – year 4	80	85.7
% making at least expected progress in maths – year 4	80	91.9

3. Barriers to future attainment (for pupils eligible for PP)
In-school barriers (issues to be addressed in school, such as poor oral language skills)
A.		Staff perceptions of disadvantaged pupils and the best way to meet their needs
B.		Effectiveness of strategies / support
C.
External barriers (issues which also require action outside school, such as low attendance rates)
D.		Parent’s acceptance of support / guidance on child’s learning.
4. Desired outcomes (Desired outcomes and how they will be measured)
A.	progress for PP children in writing and maths is in line with reading		PP make rapid progress
B.	All staff have clear understanding of effective support for PP children		High quality intervention delivered
C.	Continue to train support staff so that they are able to deliver high quality intervention to groups.		High quality intervention delivered
D.	Further develop staff who deliver the most successful interventions.		High quality intervention delivered

5. Planned expenditure
Academic year		2017-18
The three headings below enable schools to demonstrate how they are using the Pupil Premium to improve classroom pedagogy, provide targeted support and support whole school strategies
i. Quality of teaching for all
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach		What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?	How will you ensure it is implemented well?	Staff lead	When will you review implementation?
Pupils make at least expected progress in writing and maths	Teaching assistant to have allocated support session for each PP child / group of children		Time to be spent working though children understanding learning to learn – Support feedback and quality marking opportunities	Progress meetings Intervention and support minutes Learning walks	SMT	Termly

Total budgeted cost						£10,600
ii. Targeted support
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach		What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?	How will you ensure it is implemented well?	Staff lead	When will you review implementation?
Vulnerable pupils supported emotionally as well as academically	Fund learning mentor and develop the Nurture provision to focus children and families and be proactive in nurturing all vulnerable children.		We have a rising number of children who have emotional barriers to learning such as anxiety	Constant feedback from LM to intervention and support group. Logs from LM reviewed by HT Progress meetings Use of Boxall Profile assessment to establish pupil progress	leaning Mentor	Ongoing Headteacher
Create a nurture space	Learning Mentor to create a safe haven		Safe haven for vulnerable children to go to when needed. Feel safe and secure reduced possible barriers to learning	Vulnerable children positive feedback to their time in school through PEPS etc	Learning Mentor
Total budgeted cost						£20000
iii. Other approaches
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach		What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?	How will you ensure it is implemented well?	Staff lead	When will you review implementation?
_{All Vulnerable children have access to whole school offer}	Funding for vulnerable children to access music tuition and extra curriculum clubs		To support vulnerable children in access full entitlement and be part of the school / support concentration and ability to possibly excel in something other than academic studies	Continue to monitor take up of offer	A Ternent	Summer 2018

Total budgeted cost						£5000

6. Review of expenditure
Previous Academic Year
i. Quality of teaching for all
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach	Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.	Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach)	Cost
Improve teacher understanding of vulnerable children	CPD	Staff have a good understanding and knowledge of PP and the children that this impacts on within their care. Due to staff changes and movement this is something that would be beneficial to school to continue into future year.	Need more individualise package for specific staff. All very receptive to opportunity for training.

ii. Targeted support
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach	Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.	Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach)	Cost
Support vulnerable children emotionally	Work of Learning Mentor across the school	The nurture provision is a highly successful strategy which supports disadvantaged pupils beyond the classroom and helps enable them to access the curriculum	Learning Mentor role has to be flexible to meet the demands of the cohort of children within school and the complexity of the children and parents needs.	£20000

iii. Other approaches
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach	Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.	Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach)	Cost
To offer PP children broader experiences then they would normally be able to have	Fund access to music tuition and orchestra club	A large percentage of PP children took up the offer of free lessons which has given an opportunity to experience / develop skills otherwise not have the chance. Most have continued with lessons into a second year.	This opportunity has been excellent for those accessing as they would normally not receive this tuition. The opportunity for them to share with their parents in the concerts is immeasurable. Thought needs to be given to possibly funding keyboard loans for those children who want to play the keyboard but cannot afford one at home to practise	£2000
All PP children given opportunity to develop their resilience and determination	Fund PP children to attend outward bound pursuit residential trip	Feedback from children (PP and rest) very positive. Group leaders full of praise for the children, their attitude and behaviour. Excellent way to develop children’s problem solving and resilience.	Funding this activity needs to continue to ensure that all children have access to this opportunity	£1255

7. Additional detail

In this section
you can annex or refer to additional
information which you have used to support the
sections above.

Pupil premium statement 2016-17

Summary information
School	Langley First School
Academic Year	16-17	Total PP budget	£35,740	Date of most recent PP Review	/
Total number of pupils	298	Number of pupils eligible for PP	24	Date for next internal review of this strategy	January 2017

Current attainment
			Pupils eligible for PP (your school)		Pupils not eligible for PP (national average)
% achieving Level 4b or above in reading, writing & maths (or equivalent)			n/a		tbc
% making at least 2 levels of progress in reading (or equivalent)			n/a		92%
% making at least 2 levels of progress in writing (or equivalent)			n/a		95%
% making at least 2 levels of progress in maths (or equivalent)			n/a		91%
Attainment Target Tracker / ARE
Year 4 10 (17% of yr)			Points Progress Reading – 12.2 Writing – 12.4 Maths – 12.1		Points Progress Reading – 12.1 Writing – 12 Maths – 12
% at or above nat ARE – rding – 100% / Wring – 100% / M – 100%
Year 2			7 (12% of yr)

Barriers to future attainment (for pupils eligible for PP)
In-school barriers (issues to be addressed in school, such as poor oral language skills)
		Staff perceptions of disadvantaged pupils and the best way to meet their needs
		Effectiveness of strategies / support
C.
External barriers (issues which also require action outside school, such as low attendance rates)
D.		Parents acceptance of support / guidance on child’s learning.
Desired outcomes (Desired outcomes and how they will be measured)
	progress for PP children in writing and maths is in line with reading			PPM make rapid progress
	All staff have clear understanding of effective support for PP children			High quality intervention delivered
	Continue to train support staff so that they are able to deliver high quality intervention to groups.			High quality intervention delivered
	Further develop staff who deliver the most successful interventions.			High quality intervention delivered

Planned expenditure
Academic year		2016-17
The three headings below enable schools to demonstrate how they are using the Pupil Premium to improve classroom pedagogy, provide targeted support and support whole school strategies
Quality of teaching for all
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach		What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?	How will you ensure it is implemented well?	Staff lead	When will you review implementation?
Pupils make at least expected progress in writing and maths	Teaching assistant to have allocated support session for each PP child / group of children		Time to be spent working though children understanding learning to learn – Support feedback and quality marking opportunities	Progress meetings Intervention and support minutes Learning walks	SMT	Termly

Total budgeted cost						£10,600
Targeted support
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach		What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?	How will you ensure it is implemented well?	Staff lead	When will you review implementation?
Vulnerable pupils supported emotionally as well as academically	Fund learning mentor to support focus children and families and be proactive in nurturing all vulnerable children.		We have a raising number of children who have emotional barriers to learning such as anxiety	Constant feedback from LM to intervention and support group. Logs from LM reviewed by HT Progress meetings	leaning Mentor	Headteacher
Create a nurture space	Learning Mentor to create a safe haven		Safe haven for vulnerable children to go to when needed. Feel safe and secure reduced possible barriers to learning	Vulnerable children positive feedback to their time in school through PEPS etc	Learning Mentor
Total budgeted cost						£20000
Other approaches
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach		What is the evidence and rationale for this choice?	How will you ensure it is implemented well?	Staff lead	When will you review implementation?
All Vulnerable children have access to whole school offer	Funding for vulnerable children to access music tuition and extra curriculum clubs		To support vulnerable children in access full entitlement and be part of the school / support concentration and ability to possibly excel in something other than academic studies	Continue to monitor take up of offer	A Ternent	Summer 2017

Total budgeted cost						£5000

Review of expenditure
Previous Academic Year
Quality of teaching for all
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach	Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.	Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach)	Cost
Improve teacher understanding of vulnerable children	CPD	Partly - need to continue to ensure embedded in practice	Need more individualise package for specific staff. All very receptive

Targeted support
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach	Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.	Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach)	Cost
Support vulnerable children emotionally	Appointment of Learning Mentor	Yes – LM able to support specific children and negated need for fixed term exclusion		£20000

Other approaches
Desired outcome	Chosen action / approach	Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.	Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach)	Cost

Pupil Premium Statement 2014-2015

The level of the premium in the financial year 2013-14 was £953 per eligible pupil. This has risen to £1300 per eligible pupil in the financial year 2014-15. 2014-15 financial year has also seen funding for looked after children increase to £1900 and the eligibility be extended to all children who have:

have been looked after for 1 day or more
were adopted from care on or after 30 December 2005 left care under:
a Special Guardianship Order on or after 30 December 2005
a Residence Order on or after 14 October 1991

Not all of this funding comes direct to school, with a proportion being retained by the Local Authority Virtual School.
For the academic year 2014-15 Langley First School’s Pupil Premium allocation is £24,442

At Langley First School Pupil Premium money is used to ensure all FSM children and LAC children are supported in making at least good academic progress, making a minimum of 2 sub levels progress every school year. The money is used for additional teaching assistant time such as trained Speech and Language workers and to provide opportunities for teachers to plan for effective interventions for groups and individuals. Our aim is to narrow the gap in attainment and educational opportunity between those children attracting pupil premium funding and those children from more privileged backgrounds. We also look to enhance the training of our staff in such areas as attachment disorder, to ensure the most effective and appropriate support can be given to the children with the most need.

Most recently we have also used the grant to;

fund music lessons for Pupil Children pupils from year 2 to 4.
provide free school milk for PP children in Reception (once turned 5) to year 2
pay for/towards school trips including the year 4 residential trip